Âé¶¹Éç

Governance

Our work to ensure integrity, good foundation governance and transparency.

Eye

Governance embodies the procedures, rules and guidelines we adhere to within the Lundbeck Foundation.

The role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is the Lundbeck Foundation’s executive management and is composed of 11 members. The responsibilities, composition and remits of the Board are defined in the Foundation’s statutes. The Board appoints the CEO of the Lundbeck Foundation.

The work of the Board is presided over by the Chair of the Board. 

 

A Board evaluation is conducted annually in which the Board assesses whether the Board members collectively possess the right competences for fulfilling the Board’s remits.

Class room with an educator up front

If there is a need for new members, for instance, because a member may not sit on the Board for more than 12 years, the Chair and Vice-Chair nominate new members of the Board. If more specific skills are required, the Chair of the Foundation’s Grants & Prizes Committee or the Chair of the Investment Committee participates in the nomination process. External consultants are usually involved in the selection process.

Four of the Board members are employee representatives of the subsidiaries (H. Lundbeck, ALK and Falck). There are two representatives of Falck, one of Lundbeck and one of ALK. The employee representatives are elected for a four-year term. The next elections to the Board will be in 2026. 

 

The Lundbeck Foundation’s Board of Directors is represented on the boards of Falck, ALK and H. Lundbeck.

 

The Lundbeck Foundation’s Board is represented by two members of the boards of H. Lundbeck, ALK and Falck, respectively. One member is the Lundbeck Foundation’s CEO, who is also the Vice-Chair of the boards of the subsidiaries. The other member is an ordinary Board member (but not an employee representative).

None of the Lundbeck Foundation’s Board members sit or have sat on the executive boards of H. Lundbeck, ALK or Falck. This also applies to current or former members of the Foundation’s Executive Board.

Board members are elected for one year at a time.

Research project across boarders

The Foundation has selected a term shorter than that stipulated in the Danish Business Authority’s Recommendations on Foundation Governance. Instead, the Lundbeck Foundation has opted to comply with the practice of listed companies and the Danish Business Authority’s Recommendations on Corporate Governance. This ensures better potential for regular evaluation of the performance of Board members. 

Board members who have served on the Board for up to 12 years may not be re-elected. However, the Board of Directors may depart from this rule should the competency profile of the Board so dictate.

Board members who have reached the age of 75 may not be appointed or reappointed to the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors may depart from this rule should the competency profile of the Board of Directors so dictate. The work of the Executive Board is evaluated as part of the Board of Directors’ annual self-evaluation process..


Remuneration of board members (2024)

Members of the Board of Directors receive remuneration that is continually benchmarked and equivalent to that of members of the boards of directors of similar Danish foundations. The basic annual fee is DKK 237,500. The Chair of the Board of Directors receives three times the basic fee and the Vice-Chair twice the basic fee.

In addition, the Chair of the Investment Committee receives DKK 427,500 annually and ordinary members receive DKK 285,000 annually. The Chair of the Research and Prize Committee receives DKK 427,500 annually and ordinary members receive DKK 285,000 annually. Members of the Grants and Prizes Panel receive DKK 105,600 annually.

 
Overview of feesThe Lundbeck FoundationÂé¶¹Éç Invest
Remuneration for ordinary members:DKK 237,500 p.a.DKK 142,500 p.a.
Remuneration for Vice Chairman:DKK 475,000 p.a.DKK 285,000 p.a.
Remuneration for Chairman:DKK 712,000 p.a.DKK 427,500 p.a.
Membership of the Investment Committee:N/ADKK 285,000 p.a.
Chairman of the Investment CommitteeN/ADKK 427,500 p.a.
Member of Research and Prize Committee:DKK 285,000 p.a.N/A
Chair of the Research and Prize Committee:DKK 427,500 p.a.N/A
Member of the Grants and Prizes Panel:DKK 105,600 p.a.N/A

(March 12, 2025)
 

Board members who are also members of the boards of H. Lundbeck, ALK or Falck receive directors’ fees from these companies. The total remuneration for 2024 is listed in the table below.

Board of DirectorsBoard fee in DKK 1000
(2024)
Committee fee in DKK 1000
(2024)
Subsidiaries in DKK 1000
(2024)
Total fees in DKK 1000
(2024)
Steffen Kragh1,080270 1,350
Søren Skou
(Joined 12.03.2024)
580217 797
Lars Holmqvist3604051,0751,840
Michael Kjær360370 730
Susanne Krüger Kjær360505 865
Svend Andersen360270 630
Thomas Werge360370 730
Peter Schütze
(Stepped down 12.03.2024)
14053135328
     
Employee Representative    
Henrik Sindal Jensen, HLU360  360
Katja Barnkob, ALK360 350710
Mikkel Helmer Nielsen, Falck360  360
Morten Egholm Aagaard, Falck360  360
Total5,0402,4601,5609,060

In 2024, the remuneration of the Foundation’s CEO, Lene Skole, totaled DKK 18.3 million, which includes directors’ fees for the subsidiaries H. Lundbeck, ALK, and Falck and employee benefits worth DKK 0.3 million.


Good foundation governance and transparency

Transparency and openness.

The Lundbeck Foundation's Board of Directors has an annual responsibility to assess whether the Lundbeck Foundation complies with the recommendations of the Danish Committee on Foundation Governance. The aim of the recommendations is to advance good governance of commercial foundations.
 

Annual Reports

Impartiality

The Lundbeck Foundation applies the rules and principled codes of conduct governing impartiality described below. These are based on Chapter 2 of the Danish Public Administration Act on impartiality. The impartiality rules have been laid down to ensure the balance between professional expertise, transparency and impartiality in the Lundbeck Foundation’s decisions.

The rules apply to members of the Lundbeck Foundation’s Board of Directors, members of the Foundation’s grant committees, external reviewers, executive management and others who have an influence on the Foundation's grant-award decisions.
 

Disqualification

An evaluator will be disqualified from evaluating a specific application if they

  1. have a personal or financial interest in the outcome of the application
  2. have a familial relationship to the applicant such as domestic/non-domestic partner (current and former), blood relation or relation by marriage in direct line of ascent or descent, close collateral relation such as a niece or nephew, or other close relation with a personal or financial interest in the outcome of the application
  3. are or have been a supervisor of the applicant or, in any other way, collaborate with the applicant or have collaborated closely with the applicant within the past five years
  4. have acted as a referee for the applicant on the application in question
  5. have co-published with the applicant within the past five years
  6. intend to enter into a close, scientific collaboration with the applicant during the course of the project proposed in the application
  7. are employed at a public institution (such as a faculty or hospital) at which they manage or are managed by the applicant. In specific cases in which an application is of crucial importance for a particular place of employment, any staff or management at this institution will likewise be disqualified
  8. the applicant is on a research team of which the evaluator is or has been a member within the past five years
  9. any other circumstances that might cast doubt over their impartiality
     

If an evaluator is disqualified from evaluating a specific application, they will likewise be disqualified from evaluating other applications if eight or fewer applications are competing. Once a final decision has been made concerning the application subject to a conflict of interest, the evaluator will then be permitted to participate in evaluation of the remaining applications.

Guidelines in the event of disqualification

If there is any doubt about the impartiality of an evaluator in a given situation, the chair of the relevant committee or evaluation panel will decide, together with the management, whether the conflict of interest should result in disqualification.

Evaluators disqualified from evaluating a specific application may not make a decision, participate in a decision or participate in any part of the application processing. 

Exceptions

In rare cases, the committee chair and management may decide that the above rules can be set aside if the result of excluding an evaluator would be that the committee loses its evaluation competence or that the scientific composition of the committee becomes subject to substantial misgivings. If the above exception is made, with the approval of the evaluator in question, the remaining evaluators will be advised that a potential conflict of interest exists, what it consists of, and the rationale for permitting the evaluator to participate in evaluation of funding applications. 

Consequences of breach of the rules of impartiality

If an application is subsequently found to have been evaluated in breach of these rules, the following will be required:

  • Re-evaluation of the application by the respective committee or panel without participation of any disqualified evaluator.
  • Any breach of the rules is reported to the Foundation’s Board which will decide on the next steps.